Friday, June 22, 2018

The consent of the governed.

We already know our president is unfamiliar with the concept of consent. “Just kiss. I don’t even wait. And when you’re a star, they let you do it. You can do anything…Grab ’em by the pussy. You can do anything.”


Fortunately for us, his understanding of the concept is irrelevant to the fact that his government derives its power from the consent of the governed.

Whenever any form of government becomes destructive to the ends of securing the people’s inalienable rights to life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness, it is the right of the people to alter or abolish that government.  “Whenever” does not mean only on Election Day.

What aspect of locking thousands of children in cages and camps secures their lives, their liberty, their pursuits of happiness? Many of these children will never see their parents again.  Can’t we see that this abomination jeopardizes our own and our children’s lives, liberty, and pursuits of happiness? To extrapolate from the oft-quoted poem, it doesn’t get better after they come for defenseless children.  We cannot afford this man’s reckless abuse of power to continue any longer.  The president must resign.

His executive order “reversing” the policy of family separation cannot undo the damage done to these children and their families.  If we accept this “reversal”, we cannot undo the damage done to our nation.  As long as Donald Trump remains president, he disgraces the office, and thereby disgraces us.  He governs by our consent.  We cannot consent to this.

If the president does not resign, the Congress must impeach and remove him.  If the gratuitous torture of thousands of children does not constitute a high crime or misdemeanor, what does?  He does not get a do-over for this.  He does not get to try internment camps on children for size.  This is not his Katrinait is his Waterloo.

Politicians, even a president, have resigned over less egregious abuses of power.  But the call for this president to resign is conspicuously absent.  Why?  This silence is a toxic byproduct of the gradual erosion of norms of political decency.  We are accustomed to our wacky president doing wacky things.  He expects us to grow accustomed to evil as well.  We cannot consent to this.

The marches planned to protest this administration’s handling of immigration must demand the resignations of the president, the attorney general, and the secretary of homeland security.  We cannot trust or expect them to reunite the families they have torn apart or to keep other families together.  They have proven their vindictive incompetence time and again. 

With these protests, we can reinvigorate our democracy.  We together can fix it.  And it is crucial we do so now, a time when democracy is considered “in retreat”. 


In this country, the people hold the power.  We must remind the president and the Congress that they serve at the pleasure of the American people.  And we are not pleased.







Monday, June 18, 2018

Give me your tired, your poor, and I'll take those babies away: A Treatise on the Border Situation.

If we cannot recognize both the cruelty of separating children from their parents at our border and who bears responsibility for this cruelty, I'm not sure we can claw our way back up this slippery slope.  Again I ask my friends and family who voted for Donald Trump: what are the limits of your tolerance for his actions?  Where do you draw the line?  If the tearing of children from their parents does not stir rage in you, what will?  That is not a rhetorical question.  How bad does it need to get?  Because that is what our president is testing.  The American president and his disciples ask—no, they condescendingly expect your partisan fervor to override your natural empathy for that instinctual panic of a child who cannot find her mother.  But the team conveniently provides an out for those of you (presumably good Christians) who hate what is happening to the poor children: they assure you they too, as parents and Christians, hate this abomination, but there is simply nothing they can do to stop it.  The blame falls squarely on their political enemies.  Republicans only control the presidency and both houses of Congress.  The buck stops somewhere else. 

If our president is such an expert negotiator (who, let's not forget, has all the power on his side), why does he need to use real-life, vulnerable children as pawns? This is the genius of Donald Trump, you say.  He’s effectively forcing a conversation.  Many methods are effective, even sanctioned by law.  But that does not make them all moral.  The ends do not justify the means.  This is not some brilliant move of brinksmanship to force Democrats to the table on illegal immigration.  This is only cruel.  Any fool can orchestrate inhumanity in an attempt to get his way.  The strategy is not only despicable, but shortsighted.  Who else has used this strategy?  How did that turn out?

We can even look at this “policy” specifically.  Who else in history has forcibly separated children from their parents?  Nazis come to mind.  Antebellum slave traders come to mind.  I’m no policy maker, but I’d think we could find better role models.  Though I guess we shouldn't be surprised.  Our president has expressed sympathy for Nazi demonstrators before our very eyes. Our attorney general, like his father and grandfather before him, is named after the president of the Confederacy and the man who oversaw the first attack on the Union. Still, emulating those who increase their power by degrading fellow humans seems at odds that old American fundamental “we hold these truths to be self-evident, that all men are created equal”.  But maybe the founders really did just mean men, what with "original intent" and all.  Tough luck, women and children.*


Perhaps in the search for biblical justification, Sarah Huckabee Sanders alerted the president to the story of the judgment of Solomon, but he quickly got bored, heard the words "split the baby in half" and thought, "great idea."  Spoiler alert, Don: Solomon neither cuts the baby in two nor blames his murder of the child on the dispute of the mothers.  But in that movie, Republicans of Congress win best supporting actor in the role of the mother who is happy the baby dies.





*THANKS IVANKA