Happy President’s Day to
all. Will and I had a wonderful
long weekend (including a romantic Valentine’s Day trip to Costco). Perhaps I will elaborate more on our weekend
in my regular Wednesday post. In
this, my special President’s Day post, I would like to comment on the most
recent Republican presidential candidate debate. I am tempted to go candidate-by-candidate and write about my
feelings (no, Ben Carson, I will not go to your website), but rather, I would
like to focus on what I think was the most egregious statement of the
debate*. Very early on, Senator
Marco Smooth Hair Rubio claimed, “the Constitution is not a living, breathing
document—it is to be interpreted as originally meant.” Ah yes, the founders really got it
right the first time—such foresight on the women’s suffrage issue. And that three-fifths compromise…pure
gold, amirightMarco?? GARBAGE.
I am so sick of this
trash “founding fathers’ intent” argument. THE FOUNDERS WERE FALLIBLE HUMANS WHO DID NOT AGREE WITH
EACH OTHER. THERE WAS NOT ONE
COMMON “INTENT”. Almost as soon as
the Constitution was ratified (which was a battle in itself—apparently the
document was not yet glowing in the dark with its powers of infallibility), did
the founding fathers start doing battle over how to interpret it. Alexander Hamilton was stretching its
meaning from the get-go, sending Thomas Jefferson and James Madison into
conniptions. (PS I highly
recommend the Hamilton biography by Ron Chernow, and I really thought “conniptions”
started with a ‘k’.) And
then there’s everyone getting their panties in a wad about “activist” justices
on the Supreme Court. “The
founders did not intend this!!”
But what about John Marshall, the chief justice who transformed and
empowered the Supreme Court? The
original activist justice! What do
you think he did every single time?
To pretend he didn’t have an agenda is naïve.
Don’t get me wrong. I love the Constitution. I am amazed at much of the wisdom of
the founding fathers. The more I
read about the founding of our country, the more I am in awe of what they
accomplished. I truly believe we
have the best governmental system on earth—but that is because the Constitution
IS elastic. It was not engraved in
stone. It adapts to every age
because its tenets are timeless.
Furthermore, the founders knew they were not perfect, so they built in
the mechanism for amendments. How
do those fit in with your theory, Marco??
So on this President’s
Day, I ask you, my gentle readers, to please be wary when you hear a modern
politician profess to know and invoke the “intent” of the founding
fathers. That person usually needs
a good punch in the face.
|
Happy President's Day from me and the boys. |
*I am disqualifying all
Donald Trump statements from the “most egregious” category because I am so
goddamn sick of him and his terrible face/ego/yelling/tanning booth goggle
tanlines. If I were to include
him, however, the prize would go to him attempting a serious comeback at Jeb (!) with: “Yeah? Well, two days ago,
you said you would pull your pants down and moon everyone in the audience! But no one reported on that!” Sometimes I like to pretend American
politics is not a complete cat circus, but this sort of thing makes it very
difficult.